A few weeks earlier, Teller had been meeting with his friend and colleague Enrico Fermi about the prospects of atomic warfareand Fermi had nonchalantly suggested that perhaps a weapon based on nuclear fission could be used to set off an even larger nuclear fusion reaction. Even though he initially explained to Fermi why he thought the idea would not work, Teller was fascinated by the possibility and was quickly bored with the idea of "just" an atomic bomb even though this was not yet anywhere near completion. At the Berkeley session, Teller diverted discussion from the fission weapon to the possibility of a fusion weapon—what he called the "Super", an early concept of what was later to be known as a hydrogen bomb. To remove disagreement and duplication, Compton transferred the scientists to the Metallurgical Laboratory at Chicago.
The entire first half of the book was disappointingly dedicated to convincing me that the preservation of bio-diversity is a noble cause. At the most, I expected a section focused on this to fill 10 pages at the most, but I feel that half the book is ridiculously excessive. I picked up the book because I already understand that bio-diversity is positive and absolutely necessary.
I feel that people who generally agree with this will probably be the only people to pick up this book. Drilling these basic concepts into the ground actually caused me to put the book down several times, rolling my eyes.
About halfway through the book is where it starts to get good. Overall, what bothered me most were the consistent conclusions the author stated - almost out of thin air, which he then left hanging.
Unsupported, unexplored, and therefore irresponsible conclusions bother me. I find them insulting. This method of "indoctrination" was employed consistently through the book. It was so prevalent that while I agree with the author on almost all except the most liberal of his ideas, I still felt used and disrespected as a reader.
As an example, the writer consistently feels that one study can "prove" a particular conclusion.
I personally feel that many of the conclusions supporting environmental preservation are adequately supported by responsible, peer-reviewed research that has held up under repeated studies. Why not reference these studies, and reference them responsibly?
Somehow, the author chooses instead to sometimes rely on single studies, claiming their proof of "causal" relationships that, truly, do not show causal relationships at all. At best, many of the studies he cites show correlations, but I feel some studies are completely unrelated to the conclusions he draws from them.
Study that supposedly "proves" this: A well-known psychological study in which hospital patients require less painkillers when staying in a room with a window to view the outside. Drawing connections like this is irresponsible and insulting to the reader. The study sited shows exactly what is stated — that those in hospital rooms with windows generally tend to require less pain medication.
Attaching this to some distant concept is exactly the sort of quasi-science reporting that is most often exhibited in shoddy journalism, not in books by Harvard-employed scientists. In closing, if you read this book, keep your eyes open.
You may enjoy it, and some parts are quite good, just be aware of when he is trying to sell a personally drawn conclusion to you, and react accordingly. To be brief, I think this one stands head-and-shoulders above the other two as a case for the environment and a roadmap for a sustainable way of live for humanity.
I read books like this to better understand the issues we face but I personally need a healthy dose of hope and optimism to inspire me to keep up the fight.
Begley definitely needed a pronunciation consultant for numerous scientific terms as well as the writer Goethe whose name he pronounced "Goath," like a high school freshman!! Wilson, for a lifetime of science, leadership and conservation!Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products.
|You Might Like...||Support Aeon Donate now Unstanched haemorrhaging has only one end in all biological systems:|
|Labaree, Mary Schauffler||His father worked in a shoe factory.|
|What's Related||How we can write an essay quickly accounting research paper keshav. How to write a college transfer essay pdf Yale english senior essay Essay about judicial review marbury humor in society essay david futrelle can money buy happiness essays ilm ki ahmiyat essay writer essay about dubai tourism package essay feedback jeddah erfolgsfaktoren portfolio beispiel essay como hacer un research paper used, essay scholoarships crotonic coa synthesis essay?|
If you are a teacher searching for educational material, please visit PBS LearningMedia for a wide range of free digital resources spanning preschool through 12th grade. INTRODUCTION by Edward Waterman. Presented here in its entirety is Don Herron's famous essay, "The Dark Barbarian." This essay first appeared in the book of the same name, The Dark Barbarian, and was first published in This book, and the excellent essays within, were the first to take Robert E.
Howard and his work seriously and to consider Robert E.
Howard a major literary figure. Edward o wilson the future of life summary essay. 0. Edward o wilson the future of life summary essay. Published by at 30/09/ Categories.
All but dissertation gifts for moms mafalda el televisor analysis essay help to write essay kindergarten Fernando maramag essays on the great. + free ebooks online. Did you know that you can help us produce ebooks by proof-reading just one page a day?
Go to: Distributed Proofreaders. Biologist Edward O. Wilson has been observing humans and nature in a career in biology that spans more than four decades. For the last 10 years or so, he has labored to alert us to the dangers we face due to the decline in the "diversity of life, which we are so .